
The time has come to pray urgently for San Francisco and to get the word out that about a bill called Proposition K.
Below is an email that I received from Lisa Thompson, the coordinator of the Salvation Army's national initiative against sexual trafficking. She explains that if passed, Proposition K would prohibit the enforcement of anti-trafficking laws in San Francisco, a well used hub for trafficking in the States. Please read the email and the following article and then send this info to any friends you have in SF area or California in general. You should also check out the website mentioned which spells out exactly what Proposition K is and what could happen if passed (http://www.noonk.net/).
*******
Dear Friends:
Earlier today I spoke to Dr. Melissa Farley of Prostitution Research and Education. She gave me an update the efforts that she and many other people have been making to defeat Proposition K, a ballot initiative in San Francisco that would prohibit the enforcement of anti-trafficking and prostitution laws in the city. While many community leaders and experts have voiced their opposition to Proposition K, including the mayor and the district attorney, the vote is expected to be close. Dr. Farley and others have organized a political action committee called the Committee Against Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation. You can visit their website at: http://www.noonk.net/.
Should Proposition K pass, it will be a major victory of sex industry promoters and profiteers (i.e. pimps). It will also be a set back for the U.S,'s international efforts to combat sex trafficking. U.S. foreign policy clearly makes the link between legalized prostitution (by this I mean all aspects of the trade, like brothel keeping, pimping, and solicitation being legalized and regulated) and sex trafficking. Therefore the U.S. encourages foreign countries to make efforts to limit or eradicate their sex industries, not normalize them as Proposition K will if passed. Thus, you can see how foreign governments will get a very mixed message from the U.S. if Proposition K passes. The PAC hopes to raise $20,000 before or by Oct 27 so that a mass mailing can be sent to registered voters in SF explaining the terrible consequences (to victims of sex trafficking in the U.S. and abroad) of Proposition K -- see the website for more information. Please forward this email to friends and family in the San Francisco area.
Abolition!
Lisa
*******
Why You Should Vote No on SF’s Proposition K
Prop K was put on your November 2008 SF ballot by groups
that claim to be in favor of protecting “sex workers”
Masquerading as a progressive initiative Prop K this legislation will harm women, children, and the San Francisco community as a whole. The measure directs San Francisco Police Department and the District Attorney’s office to refuse to enforce the State of California’s prostitution laws. These sections include the laws used to investigate and prosecute traffickers and those involved in exploiting children. Non-enforcement of these laws would put all of us at risk, and send an invitation out to pimps, traffickers, and johns.
This dangerous legislation is a ploy to shift attention away from those who profit from sexually exploiting women, children, men, and transgenders in the sex industry. It is a ploy to take the focus away from pimps and johns. If enacted, the measure will empower pimps and offer no new protection for prostitutes. In fact, it jeopardizes the very existence of the few exit services and harm reduction programs that are currently available.
What would ending “enforcement of California’s prostitution laws” really mean?
It would mean turning a blind eye to young people, immigrants, and others who are the most vulnerable to prostitution and trafficking – those who are marginalized because of their poverty or their race or ethnicity. The average age of entry into prostitution is 12 to 14 years.
One of the provisions of this misguided proposal would de-fund services to victims of trafficking.
This initiative prohibits the City and County of San Francisco from applying for and receiving State and Federal grants to fight Human Trafficking. The cynical allegation is made that service provision to trafficking victims is “racial profiling.” In fact many victims of trafficking to San Francisco are from Asia and Latin America. In order to reach out to these victims, services must be offered in their languages. Far from racial profiling, it is absolutely necessary to offer culturally relevant services to people who are likely trafficking victims.
Ending enforcement California’s prostitution laws is to tell people who are exploited in the sex industry and prostitution that their safety is not our priority.
Millions are trafficked into the global sex industry
This flawed petition calls for law enforcement to ignore the extremely dangerous and harmful activities happening in San Francisco. San Francisco is both source and destination for sex trafficking. Women, men, transgendered people, and children are trafficked in the U.S. into the sex industry.
In 2005 Operation “Gilded Cage” rescued over 100 Korean women who had been trafficked into Bay Area massage parlors. Many of the trafficked young women were vulnerable because of limited access to language, systematic abuse by clients and pimps, threats against their families back home, and debts that they were continually tied into by their traffickers.
Victims of trafficking have received support and services from organizations like the Asian Women’s Shelter, Cameron House, La Casa de las Madres, Riley House, Safe House, and SAGE Project - all organizations that the ballot measure seeks to de-fund.
This proposal fails to recognize that prostitution is harmful to those in it
Prostitution can never be a safe industry the way most people think of safety: a safe place to live, freedom from sexual violence and harassment, and the right not be treated with verbal abuse and contempt. As a john explained, prostitution is “renting an organ for 10 minutes.” Decriminalization of johns will make no difference to the physical and the emotional safety of women in prostitution. Regardless of its legal status, prostitution is extremely harmful to those in it. There is little difference for the prostitute between legal and decriminalized prostitution.
Sexual abuse, assault, and rape of people who “work” in the sex industry is normalized in prostitution. Whether it is in a john’s house, car, a hotel, massage parlor, private dance room, strip club, legal brothel, or the street prostitution is incredibly dangerous. Researchers, service agencies, homeless shelters, and battered women’s shelters all tell us that more than 90% of those in prostitution want to escape it.
In a 2008 study after l0 years of operation, San Francisco’s SafeHouse
for Women Leaving Prostitution clients’ surveys report:
• 75% had extended periods of homelessness
• 90% had major mental health diagnoses
• 90% suffered severe child abuse and/or incest before age 18
• 90% had long-term drug addiction
• 57% never completed high school
• 75% are mothers with children in the system
• They averaged 19 years in prostitution beginning as young as 12
Prop K cuts funds to help prostituted women change their lives
Don’t abandon them
Vote NO on K
How Can A 19th Century Tradition
Be Effective In The 21st Century?
(The Salvation Army Uniform)
(Colonel Dennis Phillips) CHANGE! We are hearing a lot about “change” these days. “Change you can believe in.” “Change you can trust.” Democrats and Republicans alike claim to have the winner’s edge on change, yet neither party—nor anyone—has a monopoly on it. How easily we are beguiled into believing that “change alone” will correct everything that’s wrong even while we are not told what we are changing to.
“Don’t ever change the uniform.” I can still hear those words as the honored guest held my arm while pointing to my wife’s brilliant white uniform….hat and all. We were at Governor’s House in Kingston, Jamaica attending a reception for the Prince of Wales. A friend of mine, the British Deputy High Commissioner was escorting Prince Charles through the crowd of several hundred invited guests when he spotted us among the throngs in our brilliant white uniforms. He caught my eye and signaled me to his side, then said, “If you would like to have a personal introduction to the Prince, stand over there. I’ll lead him that way and then signal for you to approach.” We had never met a real prince before, so, feeling highly honored, we accepted the invitation.
It was less than ten minutes later when the signal was given, and within seconds, we were carrying on a conversation with the heir to the British throne. The Prince proudly spoke of his respect for The Salvation Army including recent visits to Army programs and celebrations in England. That was when he firmly grasped my arm and, paying particular attention to my wife, said, with finality, “Don’t ever change that uniform.” He went on, commenting about there being too many changes and how some people wanted to change everything just for the sake of change. “But that uniform….it must never change.”
The truth is, had we not been wearing uniform that evening, we never would have met and chatted with Prince Charles. That was nice, but I confess, not all that important. Another “uniform incident” meant far more.
I was crossing Pearson Street where it intersects with State Street on Chicago’s near north side. Territorial Headquarters was located at 860 North Dearborn in those days, and I was heading to Mr. J’s, a “greasy spoon” restaurant frequented by many Staff Bandsmen prior to weekly Tuesday night rehearsal. As I crossed the street, a young Korean woman walking in the opposite direction literally seized my arm, stopped me in the middle of the street and said with the sound of relief, “Oh, Salvation Army. Will you pray with me?”
She was holding the side of her face with her hand as she spoke, “I’ve just been to the dentist, and I’m in horrible pain. Please pray for me.” I did and offered a few words of encouragement to her, then she thanked me and went on her way.
Would she have stopped me had I been in jeans and a jacket? Of course not. And this incident is only one of many I have encountered on the streets of Chicago, in airports and, very recently, on the streets of South Bend, Indiana where I live and work.
Titus 2:14 commends us to be a “separate people.” Of course, Paul was not suggesting that Titus should put on a Salvation Army uniform (duh), and it is true that we must pursue that “separate life” in ways that can be seen with or without uniform. But, as Salvationists, we definitely have the edge here.
The uniform provides extraordinary opportunities to witness.
The uniform opens doors to service.
The uniform exudes a message of respect, honor and trust to a world that is dominated by disrespect, shame and suspicion.
The uniform sets the stage for us to be the “separate people” that Paul admonished Titus to be. In the King James Version (that would be the translation I grew up with) this verse actually calls us to be a “peculiar people.” Wow….I’m glad the more modern translations changed that. The version I really like is the paraphrase of The Message where Eugene Peterson says, “Live a life God can be proud of.” Being in Salvation Army uniform definitely strengthens our discipline to lead a holy life, and in the end, that is exactly what being “a separate people” is all about.
Wear your uniform with holy pride. Wear it well. Wear it often. Wear it to the mall or downtown on State Street or at the bus station, and when you do, be ready to represent Christ to a hurting world.
*******
For history on the Salvation Army uniform, check out this piece.